An Open Letter to Teabaggers and Other Patriots (updated again)
February 15th, 2010 by Alan
“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.”
Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address
To all you tea party folks, demonstrators, placard-bearers, shouters out at town meetings, all of you with the guts to stand up to encroaching big government…you are true Americans, and I love you. Keep fighting the good fight. I would stand shoulder to shoulder with you — that is, if I knew which of you were simply patriots and which of you are also paranoid conspiracy theorists.
Many of you dress up and pretend to be like the Founders of our nation, but in one respect you’re not like them at all: they were supremely rational, intelligent human beings. They were products of the Enlightenment. They knew what their problems were: King George, the most powerful empire in the world, the Hessians, the constant pressure to feed and clothe Washington’s ragged army, the squabbling among the colonies are they tried to create a government while fighting a war…the list went on and on — but it did not include a regiment of ferocious Bigfeet that the British were sending from Canada; it did not include mysterious black aircraft from which the British would bomb them; there were no questions about whether Washington or Adams was a British spy.
So, yes, at least some of you seem to get the point that Libertarians have understood for at least 50 years: the Federal government has far exceeded its Constitutional limits and is now operated by an oligarchy of politicians and the special interests that have bought and paid for them. It has long since ceased to be a country of, by, and for the people.
Jefferson was supposed to have said that we need a revolution every now and then, and, great nation that we are, we’ve shown we can do it (fairly) peacefully — as with minority rights, women’s rights, gay rights, etc. Peacefully — but emphatically. It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong, but nothing is more American.
As a lover of liberty all my life, I have five things to say to you:
(1) The problems that we can see are formidable enough – horrendous deficits, pointless and expensive foreign wars, a government careening toward bankruptcy because it won’t rein in its spending or its entitlements, two parties differing only in the ways in which they want to expand government and take more of your money. You are wasting entirely too much time, energy, resources, and attention on a florid variety of conspiracy theories based on dubious or nonexistent proof, hearsay, or “truthiness,” i.e., “it seems to be true because it should be.”
I know that you are frustrated and feel powerless, but that is all the more reason to focus your efforts on the real problems, not to dig up the paranoid fantasies of the past (the United Nations as the focal point for world government? LOL!!!)… or to create new ones like that whole birth certificate distraction. Please, stay focused on the real problems.
As for the government’s plans to control your life… well, they are already far advanced and well underway. (See below, under Socialism.) And as for elaborate, unproven, rumor based conspiracies, just remember this: the government is incapable of large-scale conspiracy. It is incapable of keeping a secret.
Remember Watergate? A conspiracy involving only a handful of people couldn’t be kept secret. So just remember, when you get all feverish and start hyperventilating about government conspiracies, just take a deep breath, count to 10 and remember: Government Is Incompetent. That’s why all of their conspiracies are right out in the open. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz…they all conspired to start an illegal, unconstitutional war — and they did it! That’s what real government conspiracy looks like, folks.
(2) Beware the false prophetess. You know who I’m talking about. She is a moron, a self-important ditz, a putz, a twit, a retard, a fatuous know-nothing who spouts blather in the speaking style of a space alien learning English (her idiolect is really weird). There is a reason why she does not allow the media into her speeches. They know that she will reveal herself once again for the blithering, self congratulating imbecile that she is. The speech she gets big bucks to deliver will reflect no thought, no organization, no ideas except that she herself is wonderful. The media will only spoil things by reporting this to the rest of the country.
Her kind has appeared before many times in American politics — as Huey Long, Theodore Bilbo, William Jennings Bryan, George Wallace, Strom Thurmond, and other blowhard demagogues. One of the many definitions of a demagogue is that she (I’m using the feminine pronoun intentionally) appeals to people’s basest emotions. This the former Governess does with her black-and-white analysis of the world. The ultimate narcissist, she is a vortex of simplicity and good in a complex, baffling world of evil. She knows who the enemy is.
Demagogues misrepresent the problem: it is not the Democrats. It is the fact that government is so big. A third of its disbursements go for entitlements (government is a huge waster and transferrer of money), and the debt keeps piling up. The Scottish historian Lord Wodehouslee observed that a democracy lasts about 200 years, because once the citizens realize they can use the government to get favors from the public trough, it’s the beginning of the end.
Demagogues play on the citizens’ pains and fears with feelings, not facts. They act snarky towards reason and intellect. Pointy-headed intellectuals. What newspapers does she read? “All of ‘em.” Her foreign policy expertise: “I can see Russia from my backyard” (or something like that).
Demagogues create a cult of personality. In this case, the demagogue has crafted a “slutty flight attendant” persona (not my term, but I agree) onto the traditional, I-personify-the-wisdom-of-the-common-folk persona. In a culture that worships physical beauty, that’s a huge advantage. How could such a pretty girl not know what’s she’s talking about?
From this cult of personality it follows that the LEADER, the Fuehrer, The Palin embodies the will of the people and always knows what’s best. We all agree on that. She basks in the glow of people who know she’s no smarter than they, so she certainly couldn’t put anything over on them.
She does have a point, as do all demagogues, or no one would listen to them. Government is way too big and powerful. It hurts Americans more then it herlps. It’s in a state of denial about impending bankruptcy, and the deficit keeps going up, up, and away. But the answer is not either of the two state-approved parties, and certainly not a self-serving, ditzy demagogue who knows nothing, thinks nothing, talks funny but engagingly, and sympathizes with Americans’ hard times (aside: why didn’t they just GIVE us back the stimulus money — about $3,000 per American?). Those are very poor criteria for a would-be politician — for any job, in fact.
Now you see why she is not the answer. She is entertaining or embarrassing to any loyal American who loves liberty and the Constitution. Anything she might favor (at this point in the fuehrer’s rise, she doesn’t deal with bothersome details of policy) will inevitably be unconstitutional. I am certain that she has not read the Constitution. I’m willing to bet she doen’t know what the Ninth and Tenth Amendments say.
For all these reasons, she is a demagogue and a false prophetess. I believe that at least some of you are smarter than she is. I’m hoping you can hear her bullshit for what it is. For once the word “polarizing” is correctly used. There are those who see through her and shake their heads with disbelief. There are those who lap up every word. And those still trying to decide. These differences in intellect and skepticism represent fundamental rifts in American society.
(3) I REALLY hope you’re not too late. You know, of course, that Congress, which is supposed to represent you, is already bought and paid for, and not by you. It’s been going that way for 100 years. Have you noticed?
The income tax (the Constitution had to be amended to allow it) — at first it would only be a few percent on the wealthiest. You’d hardly even feel it. Now marginal tax rates are WAY beyond that — 39% was the last figure I recall. The IRS snoops in your private financial affairs, pursues you relentlessly, and is the most hated institution in America…so why do Americans allow it to exist? If the government were small enough, fulfilling only its Constitutional functions, we wouldn’t need the income tax.
Social Security was supposed to protect widows and orphans, not wealthy retirees living to 90. Now it’s moved into the red, and it’s scheduled to go broke, with 2-3 active workers per retiree (as opposed to the original 16). Inevitably, they’re going to withhold more of your money, but benefits will go way down.
When the Soviets sent up Sputnik, we panicked and HAD to have the federal government take over education, even though we soon surpassed the Soviets with people who were ALREADY in school when the government fomented panic and took over education! Now the Department of Education wastes $40 billion a year, and American kids are among the worst educated in the industrialized world (but they have great self-esteem).
Medicare was supposed to take care of the elderly, but, as noted, they’re living much too long, there are thousands of new drugs and therapies, and Medicare too will be going broke. Total entitlement liabilities now exceed $50 trillion.
The war on drugs was supposed to…well, I don’t know what it was supposed to do (the rationale changes), but it has caused untold misery, wreaking havoc on minorities and inner cities, costing $40 billion and 5,000-10,000 violent deaths each year.
Tea party folks and fellow lovers of liberty, have you noticed any of this? Or has it become part of the wallpaper, drowned out by the screams for the latest American Idol?
Where have you been?
Did you just now notice that today government, after several exorbitant bailouts (with your money) while running two wars it started (a trillion dollars a year; again, your money), is now trying to play an even bigger role in health care, even though it’s screwed up everything it touches? Did you just get the feeling that the federal government is too arrogant and powerful? Or have YOU been sucking at the government teat in one form or another? Do you like your student loan, farm subsidy or whatever?
You liked what the government was doing, but only NOW it’s gone too far? (NOTE: I am not talking about municipal government, which is necessary to organize life at the local level, so please don’t take me for an anarchist.)
You see, I love your protests for freedom, but where have you been all these years? Were any of you protesting Vietnam or maybe even Social Security? How about the federalization of education? Farm subsidies? Or the drug war? Haven’t you noticed how once a government power grab becomes legitimate (some bureaus have been around since the Depression), people just seem to accept it? Do you think such people deserve to be free?
But congratulations on your newly-discovered sense of liberty. America is supposed to be a free country. Which brings me to…
(4) There is no need for inchoate protests and cries of “socialism.” Hell, we already have many of the planks of the Socialist Party of the 1920s enshrined as policy — federalization of retirement pensions, much of education, health care, professional licensing….Otto von Bismarck would love it. You don’t have to know anything about socialism. Just read…
THE CONSTITUTION
Yes!! Our founding document. It spells out what government is allowed to do. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments give all other powers to the states and people. If you haven’t read it, you’ll be amazed to find that most of what the government does today is unconstitutional. But when you have politicians making the laws and other politicians supposedly checking on them…well, you know what happens: wars, corruption, pork, banking crises, Depressions, and ever bigger government.
The Constitution gives you a true appreciation of what it means to be a free country. Free means that you will have dissent. You will even have excess. A Brit is supposed to have said that America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without stopping at civilization.
Owch! But we do have a civilization. It is founded on liberty. Yes, I know, if you take the Constitution seriously, then the federal government becomes much smaller. Staes would have their own policies (or no policy at all) on drugs, health care, education, and all the rest. It’s a lot more freedom. Too much freedom drives some conservatives nuts. People will be gay and watch porn! But that’s their problem. They’re control freaks. The only question is what’s best for liberty, for America.
(5) Please check out the Libertarian Party. It is already set up to funnel your anger at these arrogant bastards, these usurpers of your liberty…into actual political power, to replace the hacks and stooges with leaders who love the Constitution, who love liberty. I know, Americans love to organize, but there already is a political organization dedicated to liberty. Seek it out and support it. Fuck the government.
Hi Alan,
How deserving are the teabaggers of love and respect? Check out “Black Helicopters Over Nashville”
(I hope that the url that I’ve included will not be automatically erased).
It would seem that the article puts to rest the notion that crackpots make up only a small percentage of this movement.
Rick,
Truth above all. I want to believe that these are mostly ordinary Americans who (rightly) fear their government and sense their own powerlessness. If I’m wrong, I’ll rewrite the post. Couldn’t get the URL - can you send to my email address?
Best,
Alan
The government is out of control spendiing, with unfunded liabilities that can only lead to more taxes or by borrowing/debt or inflationary monitory policy. But will an ordinary person ever get their money back?
As long as they are taking, we must get it back. Counterintuitively, in leu of a check in our name in the mail, government services equivalent to that monetary value, say $3000 a year. That may be them paying for my health insurance, education, groceries, whatever. My outflow countered by inflow. That doesn’t mean I want government health plan, schools, food, etc; just that they pay for it directly so as to reimburse me. Say, food stamps, spent in a grocery store.
Does this encourage the government to grow and tax me even more? As long as my outflow of money is equal to my inflow of goods and services they pay for in the market, and they don’t take over that market, this is the next best thing to lowering my taxes so that I don’t have to deal with them in the first place.
So send me my social security check, economic stimulus bribe, food stamps, health insurance vouchers, whatever. It’s mine to start with. Or stop stealing from me so I don’t have to steal it back.
This is the con game they’ve been playing, at least since the 1930s: they take your money then make a big show of “giving” it back to you (while wasting huge amounts: according to one estimate, the government spends $1.60 just to collect a dollar, then wastes half of that).
Even worse, they tax the same oprganizations and entities that receive government subsidies and other benefits.
A political wit once observed that the citizenry is addicted to OPM - other people’s money.
Alan,
A comment about “Social Security was supposed to protect widows and orphans, not wealthy retirees living to 90.” Remember, social security is not a gift. It’s an entitlement to retirees who have paid into the system which you, I, and millions of other retirees who are collecting this benefit have done for decades.
The social security fund would be in much better shape if thee were no ceiling on the base on which the deduction is computed. At this time I believe that maximum is $108,000 p.a. It’s true that in one sense social security deductions are regressive to the extent than any wage earnings above $108,000 are exempt from payment into the system. That is why the cap should be lifted.
Social security was never meant to be the sole means of support in old age. It was intended to be one leg of a figurative three legged stool, the other two being pension (which few companies pay anymore) and savings. Believe me, there’s no way social security by itself “protects” retirees if that is their only source of income.
I agree with Par. 3., for sure. Nobody should depend on Social Sec. But that FICA has been 14% off the top for many years…what if I’d been allowed to keep the money and invest it myself?
It’s a lousy investment, with a negative return those who don’t live long enough (esp. African-Americans).
Also, there is nothing binding the govt to actually pay benefits! This was actually decided in a 1960s Supreme Court case.
Alan,
As for negative a negative return on social security, it’s a much better retirement income deal than the swindle that the private sector has pulled on employees by switching from pensions (defined benefits) to 401(k) (defined contributions). Almost every one who has retired in the last few years has a story to tell about losing their savings via the latter. Personally, I also got burned but nearly as bad as others.
Part of this tragedy is that with 401(k), the investor is left to his own devices in choosing investments. If trained stock brokers and investment banks can’t get it right, what chance does the average working person have to land on his feet? Well, we all found out.
True, there is still IRA, but the way that 401(k) was sold to workers in the end turned out to be a fraud that would have made Ponzi blush.
Without social security, I would truly be up shit creek.
I hate to admit that Rick has a good point- in old age you need guaranteed income, not pie-in-the-sky investments.
But what is keeping government from not paying? And how little they do pay! But yes, its better than dining on cat food.
The problem is the private sector is great in cheating workers and the government in cheating voters. Big business cuts benefits, pay, hours. Government taxes, wastes, monopolizes. They are part of the same beast: the Government/Business Complex. Both look to profit at your expense, just in different ways.
So we think Government will save us from Business (read Democrats) or that Business will protect us from Government (Conservative Republicans/Libertarians). But instead, they are a two headed monster, arguing between themselves on which is the best method to cook and eat you.
The solution is bringing back power to the individual person.
1) Tax rates must be lowered and pensions guaranteed via escrow accounts.
2) Health insurance providers should be have their anti-trust exemption taken away and compete to lower costs.
3) Personal retirement accounts with non-government institutions should gradually be phased in vs all-in-one accounts of social security/medicare.
4) Cut the work week to 32 hours and lower taxes so the net income is the same. This will produce more jobs, provide more free time, and reduce stress. No reason to stop at 32.
5) Form a foreign legion from all the illegals and send them to fight the fanatics from the ‘religion of peace’.
6) Reduce government debt to 3% or less of the GDP. Stop looking for fake easy answers like job stimulus spending. Real jobs require real businesses right here (and not overseas) so as to hire US citizens. Lower corporate tax rates for such hiring and provide other incentives.
7) Encourage education with interest-free loans for needy students, and allow income based repayment. Stop characterizing all personal issues as mental illness. Children need character and personality development, not behavior altering pills. Or they will grow up doped up dopes with no hope.
And then I woke up!
Reply to Rick:
I simply cannot believe that with all the information available via the Internet, a mature adult is unable to find a profitable way to invest. Hell, you could just make regular deposits in the bank (like they taught us in grade school)and get the same rate as Soc. Security.
This takes no brains at all, just discipline — another hot-button issue for me, since I see Soc. Sec. as an infantilizing system that does not cultivate personal responsibility.
It only takes a little more intelligence to identify reliable, low-risk investments which guarantee a fixed income. I am a Jew who’s money-challenged, and even I managed to find some.
It’s hardly a ringing endorsement of Soc. Sec. to say that it’s a safety net for which we must be grateful because of the way corporations and the govt. have dishonestly changed the rules for their own benefit.
This brings me to….
Reply to Social Insecurity:
I completely agree with your analysis, and, insofar as I’m qualified to comment, with your suggestions.
I favor anything that promotes personal responsibility, and that most certainly includes making retirement funding a matter between me and my financial institution. Government and employers should stay out of it. Just give me all the money that’s due me, and leave me alone.
Shortening the work week is in the same vein. A small fraction of the workforce actually works 40 hours. All too many are playing online or otherwise MIA because their boss is micromanaging, or they’re underutilized and or otherwise poorly managed…but, just as in school, they have to be at their desks for a prescribed amount of time. This is not how you treat adults.
I especially like (6), and I would modify (5) to fill the ranks with mercenaries, Congresscritters, and others who really think these wars are necessary. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, here’s an M-16 for each of you. If you think it’s so important, YOU go fight.
shalom and thanks to all thoughtful readers,
Alan
Alan,
Three cheers for Social Insecurity’s proposals.
Now as for the “information available via the Internet”, if you believe that those offerings are legitimate, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I’d like to sell you.
“Regular deposits in the bank”. I agree that is the easiest way of all to save, especially through an IRA, but with CD interest rates hovering around 1.43%, that is not enough to build a much of a nest egg.
Now that I have one person on my side, 299 million more to go, LoL!
Now all I need to do is sneak into the Tea Party conventions and dress up in a Sarah Palin Holloween disguise, and secretly spread ideas.
PS,
While these ideas were floating around for a while, they were not part brought all together before in one place, at least to my knowledge. It’s like making a recipe for a soup; everyone has had the ingredients before, but the new soup tastes good and different (an emergent property)!
P
Rick,
Hey, I was only giving the Internet as an example of an information source. My Mom’s well-set and she barely knows what the Internet is, but she has a good, conservative advisor.
The point is that as one grows up, one figures out how best to save and invest his/her money. Soc. Sec. = no choice.
I do not need politicians to plan my retirement. Why can’t Soc. Sec. be optional?
To Hey…
Palin’s spreading ideas? What ideas beside “don’t trust politicians,” “I’m wonderful,” and “I’m SO wonderful”?
No she is not, that’s the joke; people think she is, but her head is as empty as social security coffers. But she has name recognition, and people will listen to someone they recognize; so the joke is to have someone dressed up like her, say a look-alike, yet say something she could never on her own.
Anyway, I appreciate both you and Rick.
Wow, that sounds like a movie screenplay. Maybe I’ve been watching too many political thrillers. A brilliant female fascist who looks just like Sarah…
Thanks for the kind words.